AbortionTo be argued Mar. 2, 2016

The court will hear a challenge to a Texas law in Whole Woman’s Health v. Cole that would leave the state with about 10 abortion clinics, down from more than 40. This case has the potential to revise the constitutional principles governing abortion rights. A 4-to-4 split would automatically affirm the appeals court’s ruling without giving reasons and without setting a precedent. In this case, that would uphold the restrictions and close all but 10 clinics. The Supreme Court would set no national rules, and the relevant constitutional principles would remain unchanged.


Affirmative ActionArgued Dec. 9, 2015

In Fisher v. University of Texas, the court will decide whether the race-conscious program used to admit students to the University of Texas as Austin violates the Constitution’s equal protection principles. The ruling could affect the admissions policies of most colleges and universities. The case will now be decided by seven members of the court, because Justice Elena Kagan has recused herself.


ContraceptionTo be argued Mar. 23, 2016

In Zubik v. Burwell, the court will consider how a contraception-cover-age requirement under the Affordable Care Act applies to religiously affiliated institutions like schools and hospitals. Many of them object to an accommodation that allows them to avoid the requirement by filling out a form, saying that makes them complicit in sinful conduct. 

A 4-to-4 tie would affirm a number of appeals court decisions, most but not all sustaining the accommodation.


Jury SelectionArgued Nov. 2, 2015

In Foster v. Chatman, the court will decide whether prosecutors in Georgia violated the Constitution by systematically excluding Blacks from the jury in a capital case, leaving an all-White panel to decide the fate of a Black defendant accused of killing a While woman.

It is not clear how Justice Scalia’s absence will affect the case, which seemed headed fro a lopsided ruling favoring the defendant until a procedural wrinkle arose at the argument. 


Public UnionsArgued Jan. 11, 2016

In Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, the court will consider whether public employees who choose not to join unions may be required to pay fees for the union;s collective bargaining activities. The decision could deal a major blow to organized labor.

A loss for the unions is likely to be avoided, and the case will probably end in a 4-to-4 tie affirming the appeals court’s decision favoring the unions. 


Voting RightsArgued Dec. 8, 2015

The court will decide the meaning of “one person, one vote” in Evenwel v. Abbott. The court has long said that state voting districts must have roughly equal populations, but it has never specified whether they should have the same number of people or the same number of eligible voters. Should the court require or allow counting only voters, the political power of districts including disproportionate numbers of unauthorized immigrants could be diminished, generally benefiting Republicans. A 4-to-4 tie would affirm an appeals court ruling endorsing Texas’s approach of counting everyone.


ImmigrationArguments not yet scheduled

In United States v. Texas, the court will consider whether the Obama administration was entitled to shield more than four million undocumented immigrants from deportation and allow them to work.

A 4-to-4 ties would result in a major loss for the administration, effectively upholding a nationwide injunction blocking the program.


Capital SentencingDecided Jan. 12, 2016

In Hurst v. Florida, the court struck down an aspect of Florida’s capital punishment system, in which the state allowed non-unanimous juries to recommend death sentences and left the final sentencing to a judge, saying it did not give juror a sufficient role in deciding whether defendants should be put to death. 


Juvenile JusticeDecided Jan. 25, 2016 

The court ruled in Montgomery v. Louisiana that its 2012 decision banning mandatory life-without-parole sentences for juvenile killers must be applied retroactively, allowing the possibility of eventual release for hundreds of inmates now serving life sentences without the possibility of parole for murders they committed in their youth. 


Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.